Landlord licensing is changing again. I'm not waiting to find out the hard way

Landlord licensing in South London has changed a lot in the last two years, and it's about to change again. So this week, rather than waiting for a letter from the council to land on a landlord's doormat, I got on the front foot.

What's changing?

A quick recap of where my patch stands:

• Lambeth extended selective licensing to Clapham, Brixton, Stockwell and Kennington in September 2025, so it now covers every ward except Vauxhall and Waterloo & South Bank. Its borough-wide additional HMO scheme, for shared houses, is due to end on 8 December 2026, and I couldn't find a replacement on the council's website.
• Wandsworth started selective licensing in Furzedown, Tooting Bec, Tooting Broadway and South Balham in July 2025, and added Northcote, East Putney and West Putney in April 2026. The council has confirmed to me that no further wards have been announced. Shared houses with up to four sharers now need an additional licence anywhere in the borough.
• Southwark covers 19 wards, including most of Peckham and East Dulwich. The council has confirmed its fees are £945 for a selective licence and £1,433 for an additional licence. The current scheme runs until 2027, and a replacement will start from the day it expires.
• Lewisham has had selective licensing across most of the borough since July 2024, and the council has told me its additional HMO scheme carries on for the foreseeable future.

Fees run from about £640 to over £1,500, and in Lambeth the penalties for getting it wrong include a fine of up to £40,000 and having to pay back up to 24 months' rent. That is not a letter anyone wants to open.

So what have I done?

Two things.

First, I've written to the licensing teams at Lambeth, Wandsworth, Southwark and Lewisham. I've asked each one what happens next: are schemes being renewed, are new wards coming in, are fees changing, and what happens to licences that run past the end of a scheme.

Second, I'm writing to every landlord I look after in Lambeth and Wandsworth. Each one will hear where their property stands under their council's scheme, and that I'm already chasing the council for answers on their behalf.

No landlord of mine should have to find out from a council enforcement officer that the rules changed.

Why bother?

Here's the thing. Most of this isn't strictly my job. A landlord holds their own licence. But a good agent spots what's coming before it becomes a problem, and these schemes are exactly the kind of thing a busy landlord with one or two flats can easily miss.

That's the difference between an agent who collects rent and one who actually looks after your investment.

What happens next?

Wandsworth, Lewisham and Southwark have already replied, and the details above reflect what they told me. Lambeth is still due. As soon as they reply, I'll update my landlords, and I'll share what I learn here too. If you're a landlord in Clapham, Brixton, Battersea, Peckham or Lewisham and you're not sure whether your let is licensed, or whether your licence is about to be caught out by a scheme ending, I'm happy to take a look. No strings attached.

So there you have it. The rules keep moving, and I'd rather be a step ahead than a step behind.

As always, are you a landlord who isn't sure where your property stands? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------
07837 093 554

Sources: Lambeth Council, Selective Licensing Scheme and additional licensing designation notice; Wandsworth Council, Check if you need a property licence; Southwark Council, Private rented property licensing pages; Lewisham Council, Selective licensing page; email replies from Wandsworth Council (Merton, Richmond and Wandsworth regulatory services), Lewisham Council and Southwark Council's licensing team, October 2026. All accessed 23 October 2026.

Most first-time buyers now pay more than they did in rent: is buying in Clapham, Brixton or Streatham still worth it?

For years the maths was simple. Saving the deposit was the hard part, but once you had the keys, your mortgage was usually cheaper than your rent. Not any more.

The cold hard facts

Hamptons, using Connells Group data, found that 56% of first-time buyers who bought in September took on a mortgage payment higher than the rent they left behind. That's the highest share in at least a decade, up from 33% in September 2022.

• The average first-time buyer's mortgage payment was £1,227 a month, £39 (8.6%) more than their old rent.
• Those paying more had borrowed at an average 91% loan-to-value, a 9% deposit. Those paying less had a 17% deposit.
• Buyers in their 40s paid 18.2% more than their old rent. Buyers in their 20s still paid 7.5% less.

Why? Mortgage rates. Since the conflict in the Middle East pushed up swap rates, the average five-year fix has passed 6% for the first time in three years, according to reports. Moneyfacts says the average mortgage deal now stays on sale for just 13 days before it's pulled or repriced.

These are national figures, of course. Here, the numbers are bigger.

So what does it mean for Clapham, Brixton and Streatham?

Hamptons puts the average new let in Greater London at £2,357 a month, up 1.5% on a year ago. Renters in a one-bed off Clapham High Street or a two-bed near Brixton tube will know that number well.

Closer to home, the latest UK House Price Index puts the average price paid by a first-time buyer in Lambeth, which covers most of Clapham, Brixton and Streatham, at £474,320 in August. On rent, my own view is that a typical one-bed round here goes for £1,800 to £2,200 a month.

Who wins and who loses locally?

• Buyers with a bigger deposit (often thanks to the Bank of Mum and Dad) are still likely to pay less than rent, and they're buying in a market with more stock and more room to negotiate.
• Buyers stretching on a 5% or 10% deposit will feel the monthly pinch, at least until rates come down.
• Sellers of one and two-bed flats need to remember who their buyer is. If the monthly maths doesn't work for them, the price has to.

What I'd do now

1. Run your own numbers: mortgage, service charge and ground rent on a flat, against what you pay in rent today.
2. Get a mortgage in principle early and be ready to move fast. Deals are disappearing in under a fortnight.
3. Look at the bigger picture. Every mortgage payment chips away at a debt. Rent doesn't.

My take

The headline sounds gloomy, but I'd read it differently. Paying £39 a month more for a home you own, with security and equity building, isn't a bad deal compared with renting in London, where rents keep rising. The real squeeze is on deposits, not on the principle of buying.

And with this week's Budget and the Bank of England's next meeting in November, rates could move either way. Waiting for the perfect moment rarely works.

So there you have it. Buying costs a bit more each month than it did, but it's still building something.

Are you renting in Clapham or Brixton and wondering whether to make the jump? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------
07837 093 554

Sources: Hamptons (Connells Group data), HM Land Registry / ONS UK House Price Index (August 2026), Moneyfacts via Introducer Today, The Guardian, Property Reporter, Estate Agent Today.

House prices and rents in Clapham, Brixton & Battersea 2026

"What's a flat worth round here?" and "what should I be paying in rent?" are the two questions everyone in South London asks, usually over a drink and usually with a number they read somewhere that's two years out of date.

So let's use the official figures. On 21 October 2026 the ONS and HM Land Registry published the latest house prices (for August 2026) and private rents (for September 2026), borough by borough. Here's what they say for my patch.

One thing first. These are borough averages, not street prices. Lambeth covers most of Clapham, Brixton, Stockwell and Streatham. Wandsworth covers Battersea, Balham, Tooting and Wandsworth itself. Southwark covers Peckham, East Dulwich and Camberwell. A garden flat off Abbeville Road and an ex-local authority flat in Brixton sit in the same Lambeth average, and they're very different animals.

What is the average house price in Clapham and Brixton (Lambeth)?

£540,198 in August 2026, according to the UK House Price Index. That's down 6.5% on a year earlier, a steeper fall than London's 2.2%.

By type, Lambeth flats averaged £441,815 (down 7.2%) and terraced houses £804,615. First-time buyers paid an average of £474,320.

What is the average house price in Battersea and Balham (Wandsworth)?

£694,210, down 5.3% on the year. Wandsworth flats averaged £532,028 (down 6.5%) and terraced houses £986,873. First-time buyers paid £585,383 on average, the highest of the three boroughs.

What is the average house price in Peckham and East Dulwich (Southwark)?

£569,160, down just 2.1% on the year, in line with London. Flats averaged £466,671 (down 2.9%) and terraced houses £835,115. First-time buyers paid £497,815.

For comparison, the London average was £554,430, with flats at £427,310 and terraced houses at £648,650.

How much is rent in Clapham, Brixton, Battersea and Peckham?

ONS figures for September 2026 put the average private rent at:

• Lambeth: £2,538 a month, up 3.4% on a year ago
• Wandsworth: £2,640 a month, up 4.1%
• Southwark: £2,516 a month, up 7.3%
• London: £2,338 a month, up 3.5%

By bedrooms:

• One bed: Lambeth £1,890, Wandsworth £1,943, Southwark £1,907
• Two bed: Lambeth £2,353, Wandsworth £2,469, Southwark £2,387
• Three bed: Lambeth £2,696, Wandsworth £2,818, Southwark £2,779

So what does it mean for Clapham, Brixton and surrounds?

Now ears must perk up, because two things jump out.

First, rents and prices are going in opposite directions. Lambeth prices fell 6.5% in a year while Lambeth rents rose 3.4%. Southwark rents rose 7.3%, more than double the London rate. Generation Rent is still paying more, while the people who own the bricks and mortar have seen values slip.

Second, flats are taking the hit. In all three boroughs flats fell further than the overall average. I wrote recently about almost four in 10 London flats selling at a loss. This is the same story in the official numbers.

Who wins and who loses?

• First-time buyers in Lambeth. The average first-time buyer price is down 6.7% in a year. If you've been saving for a flat in Brixton or Stockwell, that's real money off.
• Flat owners looking to sell. With average flat prices down, pricing it right from day one matters more than ever.
• Renters, especially in Peckham and East Dulwich. A 7.3% annual rise in Southwark is a big jump on top of already high rents, and sharers are feeling it too: room rents in inner London just hit £1,002.
• Landlords. Falling prices plus rising rents means better yields for new buyers. Back of an envelope: Lambeth's average flat rent of £2,196 a month is £26,352 a year, about 6.0% gross on the average flat price. In Wandsworth (£2,341 against £532,028) it's about 5.3%, and in Southwark (£2,214 against £466,671) about 5.7%. Before costs, of course, and an average of all rents, not just new lets.

How much is my flat worth in SW4?

The honest answer is that a borough average won't tell you. Floor, outside space, lease length, condition and distance to the tube all move the number, and they can move it a lot.

The quickest way to get a real figure is a proper valuation. I'll come round, look at it, and tell you straight what it would sell or let for, with the comparables.

My take

Here's the thing. The headlines will say "London prices falling" and leave it there. Look closer and it's a flat market, not a house market, and a borough-by-borough market, not a London one. Wandsworth terraced houses still average nearly £1 million. Lambeth flats are down more than 7%.

If you're buying, this is the best negotiating position for years. If you're selling a flat, get the price right and get the presentation right. If you're a landlord, the yield maths is finally starting to work again.

So there you have it. A falling flat market, rising rents, and a lot of difference from one borough to the next.

Quick FAQ

Is it cheaper to rent in Brixton or Clapham? Both are in Lambeth, so the ONS averages don't separate them. Lambeth's average is £2,538 a month.

Which is cheapest to buy: Lambeth, Wandsworth or Southwark? Lambeth, at £540,198 on average in August 2026, then Southwark at £569,160 and Wandsworth at £694,210.

Are South London house prices falling? Yes, on the latest figures. Lambeth is down 6.5%, Wandsworth 5.3% and Southwark 2.1% year on year.

Where do these figures come from? The UK House Price Index (HM Land Registry and ONS) and the ONS Price Index of Private Rents, both published on 21 October 2026.

As always, are you thinking of buying, selling or letting in Clapham, Brixton, Battersea or Peckham and want to know what your place is really worth? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------
07837 093 554

Sources: HM Land Registry / ONS UK House Price Index, August 2026 (published 21 October 2026); ONS Price Index of Private Rents, September 2026, and ONS Housing prices in Lambeth, Wandsworth and Southwark (published 21 October 2026). Gross yield figures are my own calculation from those averages.

Should you buy a modern flat now in Battersea?

Nobody wants flats. That's the line doing the rounds, and for once the numbers back it up. But here's the thing. When everyone runs one way, it's worth asking whether the bargain is going the other.

So what's happening?

The cold hard facts:

• In June, Zoopla said over two-thirds of one and two-bed flats listed this year were still unsold. First-time buyers stepped back as borrowing costs rose.
• Zoopla's September index has flats down 1.3% on the year, the only property type falling.
• Closer to home, the official UK House Price Index puts the average Wandsworth flat at £532,028 in August, down 6.5% in a year.

Why? Leasehold, service charges and cladding. Nine years after Grenfell, the government is monitoring 4,724 buildings of 11 metres and over with unsafe cladding. Work hasn't started on 46% of them, and around 103,000 homes sit in those blocks. In Wandsworth, which covers Battersea and Nine Elms, between 101 and 200 buildings are on the list: 43% finished, 8% under way and 49% still waiting to start.

But what does it mean for Battersea?

Now ears must perk up. Battersea is modern flat country. Think of the riverside blocks, Nine Elms and the Power Station.

And it's not just numbers. Right now I'm seeing a lot of first-time buyers turning away from modern buildings, and that's leaving a lot of value on the table. That's my own observation on the patch, not a statistic.

The contrarian case, made recently by Property Hub (who run their own investor platform), goes like this. Cladding and leasehold problems are temporary. The flat is permanent. Buy while the price is down, and when rates ease the first-time buyers come back. Bear in mind that's a national view. Mine is local: Battersea, street by street.

There's something in it. Renters clearly like modern. Zero Deposit says build-to-rent homes in London average £2,560 a month against £2,280 for the wider market. Wandsworth private rents averaged £2,640 in September, up 4.1% in a year. And 89% of new homes get an A or B energy rating, while landlords face an EPC C standard by October 2030, with spend capped at £10,000 a property.

The catch

Let's face it, cheap can stay cheap.

• Rates aren't easing yet. The Bank of England held Bank Rate at 3.75% in September, and three of the nine committee members voted for a rise. Next decision: 5 November.
• Service charges. Concierge, gym and pool cost money. Ask for three years of accounts.
• EWS1 and remediation. Has the building been assessed, who's paying, and when does work finish? Your lender will ask too.
• Lease and ground rent. Check the years left and the ground rent.
• Resale. If most flats listed this year haven't sold, plan for when it's your turn to sell.

My take

Buy the building, not the brochure. A modern Battersea flat with a long lease, a clean bill of health on the walls and a sensible service charge, bought at today's prices, looks like decent value to me. One with an open remediation question is a gamble, not a bargain. This isn't financial advice, so take independent advice, of course.

So there you have it. Unloved isn't the same as unwise. But in the flat market, the detail is everything.

Are you eyeing a flat in Battersea or Nine Elms, or sitting on one waiting for the market to turn? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

Sources: Zoopla press release (30 June 2026); Zoopla House Price Index, September 2026 (1 October 2026); HM Land Registry / ONS UK House Price Index, August 2026, and ONS Housing prices in Wandsworth (21 October 2026); MHCLG Building Safety Remediation monthly data release, August 2026 (30 September 2026); Zero Deposit build-to-rent research (June 2026); MHCLG Energy Performance of Buildings Certificates, April to June 2026 (30 July 2026); DESNZ private rented homes energy performance government response (January 2026); Bank of England Monetary Policy Summary (17 September 2026); Property Hub, "Nobody Is Buying These UK Properties (They're Buying This Instead)" (YouTube).

Autumn Budget countdown: four in 10 landlords say they'd raise rents if taxes rise - what it means for Clapham and Brixton

The Autumn Budget is almost upon us, and if you're a landlord you can probably feel your shoulders creeping up towards your ears already.

A new survey has put numbers on the mood. And, as usual, the people who'd feel the consequences most aren't the landlords at all. It's the renters.

So what's the survey saying?

LegalforLandlords asked 544 UK private landlords how they feel ahead of the Budget, which is due on 28 October. The cold hard facts:

• 59% are pessimistic about the Budget.
• Just 28% are confident that letting property will still be financially worthwhile in five years' time.
• Capital Gains Tax is the biggest worry for 22%, income tax on rental income for 20%, and the cost of possible energy efficiency upgrades for 18%.
• If the Chancellor raises the tax burden on landlords, 40% say they'd put rents up where they can. 18% would consider selling and 16% would leave the rented sector altogether.

To be fair to the researchers, they point out these are landlords' stated intentions, not a prediction of exactly what will happen. Still, it's a fairly clear message.

And bear in mind this isn't starting from a clean slate. As Property118 has reminded readers, last year's Budget already announced two percentage point increases in tax rates on property income from April 2027.

The Capital Gains Tax argument

Meanwhile the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) is lobbying for Capital Gains Tax reform in this Budget. Its argument is simple, and I have to say I agree with it.

At the moment, when you sell, the whole rise in value is treated as profit (apart from certain capital costs). The NRLA's research found that only around one-fifth of the rise in house prices between 2015 and 2024 was a real-terms gain - the rest was inflation. So it wants two changes:

1. Tax the real gain, not inflation, by adjusting the purchase price and qualifying spending for inflation before working out the gain.
2. Give relief for long-term holding, so someone who has housed tenants for years is treated differently from a short-term flipper.

As NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle put it: "It is absurd that investors face Capital Gains Tax on increases in property prices that are simply the result of inflation. That's not a real gain, and it shouldn't be treated as one."

The NRLA also points to Rightmove data showing each available rental property now attracts an average of 10 enquiries, double the pre-pandemic figure. Demand isn't the problem. Supply is.

So what does it mean for Clapham, Brixton and surrounds?

Now ears must perk up, because CGT is a very South London issue.

Picture a landlord who bought a flat off the Northcote Road or a two-bed conversion in Brixton 15 or 20 years ago. On paper, that's a big gain. In real terms, a good chunk of it is simply the pound being worth less. Under the current rules, the taxman doesn't care.

That landlord has three choices: sell and pay up, hold on and hope, or put the rent up to make the numbers work. The survey suggests a fair few will do the last one.

Who wins and who loses locally?

• Renters in Clapham, Brixton and Streatham. If landlords' costs go up again, the survey suggests rents follow. With competition for every decent flat already fierce, renters have very little room to push back.
• Long-standing landlords with big paper gains. CGT reform along the NRLA's lines would help them most. A tax rise would hit them hardest and could push some to sell up - which, of course, means one less rental home on the market.
• Buyers. If more landlords sell, first-time buyers in places like Streatham and Tulse Hill could see a bit more choice. That's the silver lining, but it doesn't help the tenant who has to move out.
• Newer, smaller landlords. Squeezed from both sides - higher tax on rental income from 2027 and rising compliance costs.

My take

Here's the thing. Every time the Treasury goes looking for money in the rented sector, the bill ends up on the tenant's doormat. It's not because landlords are greedy. It's because the sums have to add up, and if they don't, the flat gets sold.

The NRLA's CGT idea is sensible. Taxing inflation as if it were profit isn't fair, and it actively discourages landlords from staying in for the long term - which is exactly the kind of landlord renters want.

Will the Chancellor listen? I'm not holding my breath. My advice in the meantime: don't make a knee-jerk sale based on rumours. Run the numbers on your own portfolio, speak to your accountant, and wait to see what's actually announced. Take independent advice, of course.

So there you have it. A nervous few days for landlords, and potentially an expensive year for renters.

Are you a landlord in Clapham or Brixton weighing up whether to hold or sell before the Budget, or a renter worried about what comes next? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------

07837 093 554

Sources: LegalforLandlords survey via Property Reporter (16 October 2026) and Property Soup (19 October 2026), NRLA via Property Reporter (16 October 2026), Property118 (15 and 16 October 2026).

Almost four in 10 London flats sell at a loss: what it means for flat owners and buyers in Clapham, Battersea and Brixton

Here's a headline to put you off your morning coffee. Almost four in 10 London flats that were resold after five to 10 years went for less than the owner paid for them.

Not a typo. Four in 10. And before the doom merchants get going, let's look at what the numbers actually say, and what they mean if you own, or want to buy, a flat South of the River.

So what's happening?

The figures come from e.surv Chartered Surveyors' October house price report, which compared repeat sales using HM Land Registry and Registers of Scotland data over the 12 months to August 2026.

The cold hard facts:

• Across Great Britain, just over a quarter of flats resold after five to 10 years of ownership fetched less than their previous purchase price.
• In London it was almost four in 10 - the highest proportion in the country.
• Among London houses held for the same period, fewer than 4% sold at a loss.
• Around a third of flats in the South East and East of England sold for less than they cost. In the Midlands and the North it was closer to one in five, and in Scotland fewer than one in 10.
• Holding on longer didn't make the problem disappear. Across Great Britain, 16.6% of flats resold after 10 to 15 years fetched less than their previous price, against 1.9% of houses.

e.surv says flats and houses started to pull apart around 2017, as leasehold, building safety, cladding and service charges increasingly shaped the decisions of buyers, sellers and lenders. Interestingly, the gap is much narrower in Scotland, which has a different system for owning and managing flats. The report is careful to say that doesn't prove tenure is the cause, but it suggests the way flats are owned and managed may matter.

And the wider backdrop? The average home in Great Britain was £328,900 in September, down 0.2% on the month and the quarter, but still 1.5% up on a year earlier. London was the only region where prices fell over the year, down 2.3%.

If you want to feel even worse, a Telegraph analysis of Land Registry data put 76% of flats in England and Wales as loss-making in the 12 months to August once you allow for inflation. That's a real-terms figure, mind, not cash.

But what does it mean for Clapham, Battersea and Brixton?

Now ears must perk up, because our patch is flat country. Think of the converted Victorian terraces off Abbeville Road and Lavender Hill, the mansion blocks around Clapham Common, the ex-local authority flats in Stockwell and Brixton, and the newer glass towers along the river at Nine Elms and Battersea.

They are not all the same product, and buyers know it. Bear in mind what the report points to: leasehold terms, building safety and service charges. Those are exactly the things buyers and their lenders now pick apart on every flat purchase.

So, roughly speaking, here's who wins and who loses locally:

• Sellers who bought a flat around 2016-2019. This is the group most likely to feel it. If you bought at or near the last peak and haven't added value since, a nominal loss is a real possibility.
• Owners in blocks with cladding questions or chunky service charges. Expect buyers to ask harder questions and lenders to be choosier. Get your paperwork (lease length, service charge history, any fire safety documents) together before you list, not after an offer.
• First-time buyers. Let's face it, this is good news for you. More choice, more room to negotiate, and sellers who are realistic about price. Do your homework on the lease and the building, though, because the reasons prices are soft are the same things that could bite you when you come to sell.
• Landlords. A flat that hasn't grown in value can still earn its keep if the rent covers the costs. Yield and capital growth are two different questions.

My take

You see, here's the thing. A flat is not a bad investment because it's a flat. It's a bad investment when you overpay, buy a short lease, ignore the service charge or buy into a building with safety issues hanging over it.

The data tells me flat buyers have got wiser, and lenders more careful. Sellers need to catch up. Price it right, have the leasehold pack ready on day one and be honest about the building. The flats that are presented properly still sell. The ones that aren't sit there, and then the price comes down anyway.

Houses, meanwhile, keep doing what houses do in London. If you're a flat owner thinking about the next step up the ladder, the numbers are a reminder to look at the whole move, not just your sale price.

So there you have it. Not quite doom and gloom, but a clear message: in the flat market, the detail is everything.

Do you own a flat in Clapham, Battersea or Brixton and wonder where you stand, or are you a buyer weighing up a flat against a small house? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------

07837 093 554

Sources: e.surv Chartered Surveyors October 2026 house price report via Property118 (12 October 2026), The Negotiator (8 October 2026), The Telegraph (2 October 2026).

The landlord register isn't a one-off: the 28-day rule for landlords in Clapham, Brixton and surrounds

A Facebook post has been doing the rounds. It says the new landlord register is NOT a one-off form but a "live record", where every change - a new gas certificate, a rent rise, even your tenant's partner moving in - must be updated within 28 days or you face a fine of up to £7,000. And, of course, there's a handy checklist "in the comments".

Credit where it's due, the post is mostly right. But "mostly" is doing a lot of work there.

So what's actually happening?

The register comes from the Renters' Rights Act 2025, with the detail in the draft PRS Database Regulations 2026, laid before Parliament on 9 September. Two things the post leaves out:

• The regulations are still a draft. Both Houses have to approve them before they're made.
• The penalties aren't in force. They need a separate commencement order, which hadn't been made when I checked.

Nobody in SW4 is getting fined next week.

The 28-day rule

Under the draft regulations, when any information or document on your landlord or property entry "becomes out of date", you have 28 days to update it. Registering isn't fire and forget.

What's on the record for each property:

• the number of occupants and households
• HMO, additional or selective licence status and numbers
• the gas safety record, EICR and EPC
• the rent, how often it's paid and which bills are included
• whether it's furnished, and whether it's currently let

So yes, a partner moving in changes the occupant count, and the NRLA reads renewed certificates and rent changes as updates too. (The draft regulations don't list trigger events, and official GOV.UK guidance isn't out yet.)

But "every change"? No. Tenant names, deposits and repairs aren't on the list. Fixing the boiler isn't a register event in itself.

It's annual too

Entries must be renewed every 12 months. GOV.UK puts the fee at £65 per property per year, though it can change. And if you have more than one property, they all share the renewal date of your first one.

Quick numbercrunch for a landlord with three flats: 3 x £65 = £195 a year, all due on the same day. Put it in the diary.

What the penalties really are

• Up to £7,000 for failing to register or keep entries up to date. That's a maximum. Each council sets the amount, and there's no minimum.
• Up to £40,000, or prosecution, for knowingly or recklessly giving false information, carrying on more than 28 days after a penalty is final, or another breach within five years of a penalty.
• No rent repayment order just for being unregistered. An RRO only comes into play for the false-information offence, or for carrying on after a penalty.
• No possession order without an active entry. Apart from two anti-social behaviour grounds, a court can't make a possession order while you have no active landlord or property entry. An entry you didn't renew counts as inactive, and so does one where the tenancy and safety details weren't added within 28 days.

A correction from me

In my last post on the register I said the penalty for ignoring it could be two years' rent. That overstated it. Simply not registering means a penalty of up to £7,000 and a block on possession, not a rent repayment order. I also said tenants will be able to check whether their landlord is registered. That's the plan, but not at launch - public access needs further legislation and there's no date yet. I'd rather tell you straight.

But what does it mean for Clapham, Brixton and surrounds?

London is the second-last region. Duties start on 15 July 2027 and the deadline is 14 October 2027, for Lambeth, Wandsworth and Southwark alike. So Streatham, Brixton, Battersea and most of Dulwich all register in the same window. It depends on where the property is, not where you live.

Picture an accidental landlord with one flat off Abbeville Road. She registers in August 2027 and forgets about it. Next spring her tenant's partner moves in and the rent goes up. On the NRLA's reading that's two updates, each with its own 28-day clock. Then, in August 2028, the renewal.

A letting agent can update the tenancy and safety details and whether the property is let. What they can't do is register you in the first place. That's on you.

Who wins? Organised landlords with one folder per property. Who loses? The shoebox brigade.

About that checklist in the comments

I'm not calling any particular post a scam. But "link in the comments" is a classic engagement-bait trick, and those links are sometimes lead-capture forms, paid "compliance packs" or pages dressed up to look like GOV.UK. Register only through the official GOV.UK service (or its official paper form), where the only fee mentioned is £65 per property. Don't pay a third party to "register" you, and be suspicious of any unsolicited "register now" message before the service opens on 15 December 2026.

My take

The post is broadly right, just early and breathless. Good landlords already know when their gas certificate is due. The real risk in Clapham and Battersea isn't a £7,000 fine landing on the doormat. It's a stale entry quietly going inactive just when you need possession.

In summary

So there you have it. A 28-day update duty for the listed items, an annual £65 renewal on one shared date, and penalties not switched on yet. London's window is 15 July to 14 October 2027.

Are you a landlord in Clapham, Brixton or Dulwich, and have you got a system for keeping your paperwork current? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------

07837 093 554

Sources: Draft PRS Database Regulations 2026 and Explanatory Memorandum (legislation.gov.uk), Renters' Rights Act 2025, GOV.UK Housing Hub, GOV.UK civil penalties guidance, NRLA.

The landlord register opens in December: what landlords in Clapham, Brixton and Streatham need to do now

For the first time ever, England is going to keep a single list of who lets property and where. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have had one for years. Now it's our turn, and it comes with a fee, a deadline and a lot of paperwork.

So what's happening?

The new Private Rented Sector Database, better known as the landlord register, opens in the West Midlands on 15 December 2026. Other English regions follow in stages until August 2027, according to Property Reporter (16 October). Landlords will have three months to register once their region opens, and the fee is £65 a year per property.

To register, you'll need each property's gas safety record, electrical safety report and EPC. Property Reporter's guest piece from Logan Ransley of Landlord Studio (12 October) makes the point that this is where many landlords will discover something missing or out of date. That gas certificate buried in an old email. The electrical report that quietly expired last spring.

And there's teeth. Tenants will be able to check whether their landlord is registered, and once the rules are fully in force a tenant renting from an unregistered landlord can apply to get back up to 24 months' rent. Two years' rent. That should focus a few minds.

Councils are also being funded to enforce the Renters' Rights Act. Ransley's FOI request found Newham's funding more than doubled in a year, from around £169,000 in 2025/26 to more than £364,000 in 2026/27, even though Newham landlords won't have to register until next summer.

It all lands in a busy year. Making Tax Digital started in April for landlords with qualifying income over £50,000, most of the Renters' Rights Act came into force in May, and Property Reporter (12 October) noted only 35% of landlords can name their own MTD start date. TwentyCi found around 560 rental properties a day were sold in Q3 2026, up from around 500 a day a year earlier and fewer than 170 in 2020.

But what does it mean for Clapham, Brixton and surrounds?

Our patch straddles Lambeth, Wandsworth and Southwark, with Streatham and Brixton in Lambeth, Battersea in Wandsworth and Dulwich mostly in Southwark. If Newham's "next summer" is a guide, London landlords probably have a few months yet. Registration for Lambeth, Wandsworth and Southwark landlords is expected in 2027.

Bear in mind that your deadline depends on where the property is, not where you live. If you live in Dulwich but own a flat in Birmingham, you could be registering that one first, from 15 December.

Think about who lets in our area. Accidental landlords who kept a flat in Clapham Old Town when they moved out to start a family. Long-term investors with a few conversions off Streatham Hill. Owners of new-build flats around Battersea Power Station. The professional, fully managed landlord will barely notice. It's the one-flat, do-it-yourself landlord who is most likely to be caught out.

Quick numbercrunch for a landlord with three flats:

• Registration: 3 x £65 = £195 a year
• Risk of not registering: up to 24 months' rent per tenancy

Not a hard choice.

Who wins and who loses?

• Good landlords. Mostly fine. As Dirk Dette of Campions Group put it via Property Reporter, the information requested largely relates to obligations landlords should already be meeting. The difference is that gaps become visible.
• Disorganised landlords. Expired certificates and missing paperwork will show up quickly.
• Rogue landlords. That's the theory, anyway. Veco's chief executive Richard Murray asks the obvious question: will those determined to operate outside the rules simply choose not to register?
• Tenants. A public way to check their landlord is legitimate, and a powerful remedy if not.

My take

I'll be honest, I share Veco's scepticism. The compliant majority will dutifully pay their £65 and upload their certificates, while the cowboys at the bottom of the market carry on as before unless councils have the people and the will to chase them. The Newham funding figures suggest the money is starting to arrive. Whether that becomes enforcement on the ground in Lambeth and Wandsworth is another matter.

That said, I'm not going to pretend this is a disaster. Another layer of admin, yes. Another £65 per property, yes. But for good landlords it's a chance to prove they do things properly, and in a market where tenants have more choice than ever, being visibly compliant could become part of what you're selling.

Practical steps for now, borrowing Ransley's three-step plan: check which region each of your properties sits in; pull all certificates, expiry dates and tenancy agreements into one place per property; and start logging rent, costs and tenant messages as they happen rather than at year end. An hour a month beats a lost week when the council or HMRC comes knocking.

In summary

So there you have it. The register opens on 15 December, costs £65 a year per property, and the penalty for ignoring it could be two years' rent. London's turn looks like 2027, but the paperwork you'll need is paperwork you should already have.

Are you a landlord in Clapham, Brixton or Streatham, and is your certificate folder in order, or more of a shoebox? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------

07837 093 554

Sources: Property Reporter (12 and 16 October 2026), Landlord Studio, Veco, Campions Group, TwentyCi.

Room rents in inner London just hit £1,002: what it means for sharers in Clapham

Spend ten minutes on the Common on a Saturday and you'll spot them: two or three mates, coffees in hand, walking back from a viewing they've just queued for. Flatshares are the engine room of Clapham. They always have been. And this week the numbers caught up with what I've been seeing on the ground all autumn.

Room rents in inner London have reached an average of £1,002 a month. That's up 2.3% on the quarter and 1.1% on a year ago, and it's within a pound of the all-time record of £1,003 set at the end of 2023 (figures reported this week via SpareRoom). Nationally, the average UK room now costs £769 a month, itself a fresh record, up 1% on the year. So renting a single room in a shared flat down here now costs more than renting a whole one-bed does in large parts of the country.

It isn't a blip either. Surveyors expect more of the same: a net 37% of them told RICS they think rents will keep rising over the next three months. Demand is up, supply is down, and nothing in the pipeline suggests that flips soon.

For a young professional moving to Clapham, Balham or Stockwell, the sum is sobering. A £1,002 room is roughly £12,000 a year before a single bill, before council tax, before the Northern line. Share a three-bed off Abbeville Road or near Clapham Common and the landlord is collecting around £3,000 a month for the flat. That's why so many sharers I speak to are staying put rather than moving in the autumn. The devil you know is cheaper than the devil advertised on the portal.

For landlords, it looks like a win, and in cash terms it is. But I'd read it with a cool head. Rents at or near record highs are not a sign of a healthy market. They're a sign of a market that has run out of homes. Tenant demand keeps climbing while rental stock keeps shrinking, and squeezing more out of a smaller pool is not a strategy, it's a symptom. When affordability stretches this far, you get more arrears, more churn and more tenants who simply can't take the next increase.

Here's my take. If you're a sharer in SW London, the smart move right now is to lock in. A good flat with decent flatmates at a fair rent is worth holding through the winter rather than rolling the dice in a market where every viewing has a queue behind you. Talk to your landlord about a longer term before your renewal lands, because stability cuts both ways and most will take a reliable tenant over a void. And if you're a landlord sitting on a flat that works, resist the temptation to chase the headline number to the last pound. The best tenants are the ones who stay, and in this market keeping a good one is worth more than a £50 bump that pushes them out the door.

Are you sharing in Clapham and feeling the squeeze, or a landlord weighing up a renewal this winter? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

---------

07837 093 554

The £65 landlord register is here - what every Clapham landlord needs to do now

I had a call this week from a landlord who owns one flat near Clapham Common - a flat she used to live in, now let to a lovely couple. She isn't a property mogul. She's an accidental landlord with a single tenancy and a full-time job. And she wanted to know if "this new register thing" applied to her. It does. So if that sounds like you, read on.

The government has now launched the private rental registration service and confirmed the timetable for the mandatory database of landlords and rented properties in England. The headline figure is a £65 annual fee - per property, not per landlord - to register. Alongside it, HMRC is being lined up to handle rent-increase disputes, which is a real shift: the argument about whether your rent rise is fair moves into a formal channel rather than a conversation on the doorstep. This is all part of the machinery of the Renters' Rights Act finally being switched on.

Here is what the register actually is, in plain English. It's a national record of who lets property and which properties are let, tied to your compliance paperwork. Think of it as an MOT logbook for the rental sector. You register the landlord, you register each property, you pay the fee, and you keep the details current. It is not optional and it is not something you can quietly ignore, because it plugs into the wider enforcement regime - the same one where licensing breaches under the Act can now carry fines of up to £40,000.

For a Clapham or Balham landlord, the practical to-do list is short but real. First, get your compliance file in order before you register, not after - gas safety certificate, EPC, electrical safety report and deposit protection details. Registering with gaps in that paperwork just paints a target on your back. Second, budget for the fee across your portfolio: £65 on one flat is nothing, but if you hold four or five conversions around Abbeville Road or Stockwell it adds up and it recurs every year. Third, get your head around the rent-review process now, because with HMRC in the mix the days of an informal "I'm putting it up £150" are over. Do it properly, in writing, on the right form, at the right time.

My take? This is more admin, and no landlord enjoys more admin. But I'd resist the urge to see it purely as a burden. A register that pushes the worst operators out - the ones letting damp, unsafe flats and dragging the whole sector's reputation down - is no bad thing for the good landlords who already do it right. If you keep a decent flat, look after your tenants and hold your paperwork properly, this changes very little about how you operate. It just writes down what you were already doing. The landlords who should be nervous are the ones who've been cutting corners, and frankly, in a market as scrutinised as SW London, those days were numbered anyway.

The one thing I'd say clearly: don't leave it. Registration and the new rules are being rolled out on a fixed timetable, and the landlords who scramble at the deadline are the ones who make expensive mistakes.

Are you a landlord in Clapham or the surrounding area wondering how the register affects your flat? I'm happy to talk it through - drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

Virus-free.www.avast.com

London rents just jumped 9.8% in a month. Here's what's really going on in Clapham

Stand outside any letting board on Clapham High Street for ten minutes and you'll see it: a viewing, then another, then a couple already filling in a holding form on their phone before they've left the pavement. The queue is real. And this week the numbers caught up with what we've been living down here all summer.

Advertised rents across London rose 9.8% in August. That is not a typo, and it is not annual growth dressed up as a monthly figure - that is where asking rents landed last month as landlords listed higher. At the same time, flatshare supply fell 3.2% and room rents hit a fresh record high. Fewer rooms, fewer flats, more people chasing them. Nationally, gross rent on the average landlord's portfolio has climbed to somewhere between £88,454 and £90,000 a year, and rental growth is now accelerating across five English regions since the Renters' Rights Act landed.

So what is actually driving it? Part of it is the Act itself. With Section 21 gone and rent reviews tightened, a lot of landlords are front-loading: if you can only realistically move the rent once a year through a formal process, you set it higher at the start. That is not greed, it is arithmetic, and it is showing up in the asking prices from Stockwell to Streatham. The other part is plain supply. Every landlord who has sold up over the last two years, spooked by tax and regulation, is a flat that has left the rental pool for good. Down here, where two-bed conversions off Abbeville Road and around Clapham Common are the backbone of the market, that thinning stock bites hard.

If you're renting in SW London right now, the honest advice is to move fast and come prepared. Have your references, deposit and proof of income ready before you view, not after. A well-presented flat near the Common at a fair rent is gone in days, and the person who gets it is usually the one who could say yes on the spot. Stretching your budget by £100 a month to widen your search into Tooting or Balham will often get you far more than holding out for a bargain that isn't coming.

If you're a landlord, this is the moment to be careful, not cocky. A record asking rent means nothing if the flat sits empty for three weeks or the tenant leaves in six months because the price never stacked up. Voids are the quiet killer here - four in ten portfolios nationally are carrying them - and an empty month wipes out most of the gain from a punchy headline rent. Price it to let quickly to a good tenant who stays, and you'll almost always beat the landlord chasing the top of the market.

My take: this is a supply problem wearing a price-rise costume. Rents aren't high because tenants suddenly have more money - they're high because there isn't enough to go round. Until we get more homes into the SW London rental market, not fewer, this pressure isn't easing. And every well-intentioned rule that nudges another landlord towards selling makes it a little worse for the renters it was meant to help.

Are you feeling the squeeze on the rental market in Clapham - as a tenant or a landlord? I'd genuinely like to hear how it's playing out on your street. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

Virus-free.www.avast.com

Another tax on landlords: the new £65-a-year landlord database explained

The government has confirmed it. The new Private Rented Sector Database, the "landlord register" everyone has been talking about since the Renters' Rights Act, goes live on 15 December 2026.

Here is what it actually means for you if you own a rental property:

£65 per property. Per year. Not a one-off. You pay it on registration and you pay it again every year to renew. Five flats? That is £325 a year, every year, just to have your name on a list.

You cannot delegate it. Your agent cannot register the property for you. You have to log in and do it yourself, property by property, uploading the address, the rent, the number of bedrooms, who lives there, gas safety, EICR and EPC certificates.

Miss it and the fine is up to £7,000. Get it wrong, or keep getting it wrong, and it is up to £40,000.

No registration number, no advert. Agents will be banned from marketing a property that has not been registered. So if you are late, your property sits empty while you sort the paperwork.

It rolls out region by region. West Midlands first in December, London from 15 July 2027 with a deadline of 14 October 2027.

Now let's be honest about what this is

This is not about rogue landlords. Rogue landlords do not register for things. They never have. The people who will dutifully log in, pay their £65 and upload their certificates are the same landlords who were already doing everything right.

Let's stack it up. In the last decade the private landlord has lost mortgage interest relief (Section 24), paid a 3% then 5% stamp duty surcharge on every purchase, watched the capital gains allowance cut from £12,300 to £3,000, faced the end of Section 21, seen selective licensing spread borough by borough at several hundred pounds a go, and now has to fund a database on top. Each one on its own is "only" a small charge. Together they are the reason so many good landlords have sold up.

And here is the bit the politicians never say out loud: landlords do not absorb costs. They pass them on. Every one of these charges ends up in the rent. Fewer landlords means fewer rental homes, which means higher rents. The person paying for this database is the tenant it claims to protect.

I have been an agent in South London for over 20 years. I speak to landlords every week who are tired. Not of tenants, not of the work, but of being treated as the problem to be solved rather than the people providing 4.6 million homes the state has no way of replacing.

If you are a landlord, here is my advice

1. Do not panic, London is not until July 2027. But diarise it now.
2. Get your certificates in order this year. Gas, EICR, EPC. If any of them are missing you will not be able to register.
3. Budget £65 per property into your annual numbers and, frankly, into your rent review.
4. If you have been thinking about selling, know that the market is still moving and good stock is still selling. Do it on your terms, not because a fine forced you.

If you want a straight conversation about what your property is worth today, either to let or to sell, get in touch. No sales pitch, just 20 years of knowing this market.

Sources: NRLA, Property118, Landlord Today, The Independent Landlord (September 2026).

---------

07837 093 554

The Renters' Rights Act is here - the Clapham landlord's real to-do list

There's a particular look I've seen a lot lately across the desk from Clapham landlords: part resignation, part "just tell me what I actually have to do." The Renters' Rights Act has been talked about for so long that some owners have switched off entirely. That's the mistake. As one industry voice put it bluntly this week, this is a storm agents and landlords cannot simply wait out. So instead of another doom-laden overview, here's the practical version for anyone letting a flat round here.

First, understand what's genuinely changed. The Act ends the old no-fault route landlords relied on and moves everything onto a system where you need a proper legal ground to seek possession. To cope with the extra disputes, the government has been recruiting around 1,000 new judges for the courts that will handle these cases - a detail that tells you how much more of this will end up formally contested rather than settled with a quiet notice. There are new specific grounds too, including a student-possession ground (Ground 4A) that matters if you let to sharers on academic-year cycles, as plenty of landlords near the commons and around Battersea do.

Second, get your compliance genuinely in order, not "mostly". The days of a relaxed attitude to paperwork are over, because when possession has to go through a ground, your evidence trail is everything. That means a current, valid EPC, gas and electrical safety certificates in date, deposit protected and prescribed information served, and a tenancy agreement that reflects the new rules rather than a template from three years ago. If any of that is shaky, sort it before you need it, not after a dispute has started.

Third, think carefully about rent. Tribunals are already pushing back hard on increases - one analysis of around 200 determinations found roughly 73% of proposed rises were cut. The lesson for a Clapham landlord isn't to give up on fair increases, it's to make them evidence-based and defensible: know your comparable rents on your own street, document them, and price a review where you'd be comfortable justifying it, rather than reaching for a number and hoping it sticks.

Here's my take. I understand why some landlords are heading for the exit, and I've written before about the sell-off. But for those staying, panic is not a plan and neither is denial. The landlords who'll do fine under this Act are the organised, professional ones - the people who treat letting like the business it now clearly is, keep their properties in good order, and build genuine relationships with good tenants they want to keep. In a market this short of rental homes, a reliable tenant in a well-run flat is an asset worth protecting, not a liability to manage at arm's length.

Are you a landlord in Clapham or nearby trying to work out what the Renters' Rights Act means for your flat? Send me your situation and I'll give you a straight, practical steer - no scaremongering. Email jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

56% of landlords now plan to sell - and Clapham's flats are first in line

Every few weeks another buy-to-let landlord walks into my office with the same opening line: "I think I'm done." Usually it's someone who bought a one or two-bed flat off Clapham Common or near Abbeville Village years ago, has had a decent run, and is now quietly worn down by the paperwork, the mortgage rates and the sense that the rules keep moving against them. This week the numbers caught up with the mood on my sofa.

The Deposit Protection Service's latest review found that 56% of landlords now plan to sell some or all of their portfolio, up from 53% last October. Pair that with Benham and Reeves reporting that just 3.9% of landlords intend to expand, and you have a private rented sector that is shrinking at one end and barely growing at the other. The English Private Landlord Survey adds the detail that matters locally: landlords with five or more properties account for 49% of all private tenancies, despite being only 17% of landlords. In other words, a small number of committed players hold up a big share of the market, and when they start heading for the door, the effect is outsized.

Down here that plays out flat by flat. Clapham, Balham and Stockwell are stuffed with the exact stock these landlords own - period conversions and purpose-built one and two-beds that were the classic first buy-to-let. When one of them sells, the flat often goes to an owner-occupier rather than another investor, so it leaves the rental pool for good. Multiply that across a few streets and you can see why renters near the Common tell me every viewing feels like a scrum. Void periods have actually fallen to around 21 days nationally, which is another way of saying good rental flats are being snapped up almost as fast as they appear.

Here's my honest take, and it cuts both ways. If you're a landlord who has genuinely had enough, selling into today's market is not the disaster some headlines suggest - owner-occupier demand for a well-presented Clapham flat is real, and you may do better selling with vacant possession to a homebuyer than to a nervous investor. But if your numbers still work, think hard before you join the stampede. Fewer rental flats plus steady tenant demand is, bluntly, a supportive backdrop for the landlords who stay. The ones selling in a panic may be handing a stronger position to the ones who hold their nerve.

Either way, the worst move is to drift. If you own a flat round here and you're on the fence, get a proper, current valuation and a straight read on your yield before you decide - not a guess based on what your neighbour got in 2021.

Are you a Clapham landlord weighing up whether to sell or sit tight this year? I talk this through with owners most weeks and I'm happy to give you a straight steer. Email me at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

Virus-free.www.avast.com

Nine renters for every flat: inside the SW London rent squeeze

Walk past any letting board near Clapham Common on a Saturday and you'll spot it - a small knot of people outside a flat, phones out, all there for the same 20-minute viewing slot. Down here that queue isn't a one-off, it's the market. And this week the national figures finally put a shape to what renters round here already feel in their gut.

The Office for National Statistics reports that average private rents rose 3.7% in the 12 months to July 2026, with the UK average private rent now sitting at 1,393 pounds a month. Separate reporting this week put annual rental growth as high as 4.3% and estimated that tenants are now spending roughly a third of their income on housing. The Institute for Fiscal Studies goes further still, finding renters spent about 28% of household income on housing in 2024-25. And the story behind the queues is supply: with reports of as many as nine renters chasing every available flat, there simply aren't enough homes to go round.

In Clapham, Balham, Brixton and Stockwell those national averages are a soft-focus version of the truth, because London rents start well above 1,393 pounds and the competition is fiercer. When a two-bed conversion off Abbeville Road comes up, it doesn't sit - it's gone in days, often to whoever can move fastest and offer cleanest. That's the bit the percentages don't capture: the couple who've been outbid three times since June, the sharers stretching to a postcode they can just about afford, the tenant who renews at a higher rent simply because moving feels riskier than staying. Rising rents and thin supply don't just cost money, they cost people their options.

My take, and renters won't always want to hear it: in a market this tight, preparation beats hope. If you're flat-hunting in SW London right now, be viewing-ready before you turn up - references lined up, proof of income to hand, a realistic budget that includes the deposit and first month, and a genuine sense of which streets you'll actually accept. The renters who lose out are rarely the ones offering the most; they're the ones who dither while someone more organised says yes. And if you're a good tenant already in a decent flat, think twice before walking away from it in this climate - a rent you can negotiate is often better than a search you can't win.

None of this is a lecture. The squeeze is real and it's structural, and it won't ease until more rental homes come back into the market rather than leaving it. But knowing the numbers - and knowing your patch - is how you stop being the ninth person in the queue and start being the one who gets the keys.

Renting in Clapham or the surrounding area and feeling the crunch? Tell me what you're up against - I know this local market inside out and I'm glad to point you in the right direction. Reach me at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

Virus-free.www.avast.com

Four Out of Five Homes That Sell Never Drop Their Price. What That Tells You About Selling in Clapham

There is a flat on a road off the Common that has been sitting on Rightmove since spring. Nice flat. Good road. Nothing wrong with it at all, except the number on the front of it. A vendor I met last week asked me why it still had not gone, and the honest answer is the one nobody wants to hear at a valuation: it launched at a price the market did not believe, and every week since has been spent slowly proving that.

Some numbers landed on LinkedIn this week that make the point better than I can. Data from Sprift, covering 710,729 homes that came onto the UK market since 1 January 2026: only 238,105 of them have had a sale agreed. That is a third. Two out of every three sellers who launched this year are still waiting.

Now the part that should change how you think about your asking price. Of the 238,105 that did sell, 80.08% sold without a single price reduction, and they did it in an average of 28 days. The 20% that needed a reduction took an average of 64 days to get a sale agreed. Same market, same month, same buyers. More than double the time, and a lower price at the end of it.

Down here the pattern is identical. Across SW4 in June there were 136 homes on the market and 40 of them found a buyer. The flats sitting on the market carried a median asking price of £525,000; the flats that actually got agreed did so at a median of £475,000. On average an SW4 home took 52 days to go under offer, which is quicker than the national 59 - our market is not slow, it is just unforgiving of a punchy number.

Here is what that means in practice if you are selling in Clapham, Balham, Stockwell or Abbeville Village this autumn. Your first two to three weeks are the whole ballgame. That is when every buyer already registered and hunting sees your flat for the first time, when the portal alerts fire, and when your viewing diary is at its fullest. Price it right and you are choosing between offers while the launch buzz is live. Price it 8% high to "test the market" and those same buyers scroll past, you get the trickle rather than the flood, and eight weeks later you reduce to the number you should have started at - only now every buyer can see how long it has been sitting and treats you accordingly. The reduction does not fix the problem. It advertises it.

My take, and I will say it to any vendor who asks: never let anyone value your home on what you want it to be worth, including me. Value it on the last three genuinely comparable sales on your street or the one next to it, then decide whether you want to sell or you want to advertise. Testing the market is not a free option. It costs you five weeks, your best buyers, and usually more money than the reduction you were trying to avoid.

Are you sitting on a home that has been out there too long, or thinking about launching this autumn and wondering where the number should be? Tell me the road and I will tell you straight what I think it will actually sell for. Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554.

Sources: Sprift listing data (1 January to August 2026), shared on LinkedIn; SW4 monthly market data, June 2026.

Record stock, falling prices: why this is the best autumn to buy in Clapham for years

 Walk past any of the estate agents around Clapham Old Town this month and the windows tell the story before I do. There are more boards up than I have seen in a long while, and a good few have quietly grown a "reduced" sticker. If you have been sitting on your hands waiting for the London market to blink, it just did.

Rightmove's latest figures, out this week, put some numbers on what we are all feeling on the ground. The average new asking price across the country fell 2% this month to £364,999, the biggest monthly drop they have recorded since 2018. The reason is simple: supply. There are more homes on the market now than at any point in 12 years, and when buyers have that much choice, sellers have to compete. Rightmove went further and called London the worst-performing part of Britain by almost every measure, with agents at Hamptons and Connells reporting that sellers are increasingly cutting asking prices to get a deal done.

Down here that plays out street by street. A two-bed flat off Abbeville Road or a terraced house near the Common is no longer the only show in town. Buyers who missed out on three places last spring are suddenly the ones with the whip hand, walking into second viewings knowing there is another perfectly good flat round the corner. For sellers it means the days of sticking an optimistic number on the listing and waiting are over. Price it to the market from day one, or watch it drift and pick up the "reduced" sticker that quietly tells every buyer you got it wrong.

Here is my honest take, and it will not suit everyone. If you are a buyer in a position to move, this is the strongest hand you will have held in Clapham for years. Not because prices are collapsing, they are not, but because choice plus nervous sellers plus softer mortgage rates is a genuine window. Lenders have been trimming again, with several buy-to-let and residential rates edged down over the past fortnight, and a motivated seller in a 12-year-high market has every reason to take a sensible offer rather than gamble on the autumn. That combination does not come around often.

For sellers, do not panic and do not believe anyone who tells you the market has fallen out of bed, because it has not. What has changed is that presentation and pricing now do all the heavy lifting. The homes moving well around Clapham and Balham are the ones that are sensibly priced, properly photographed and ready to view. Get those three right and you will still sell, and sell well. Get greedy on the asking price in a market this well stocked and you will simply hand the advantage to the flat down the road.

So the question I would leave you with: are you a buyer who has been waiting for exactly this, or a seller wondering whether to launch now or hold until spring? There is no single right answer, but there is a right answer for your situation, and it is worth talking through before you commit either way.

Thinking about a move in Clapham or the surrounding area this year, or just want a straight view on what your place would really fetch today? Drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call 07837 093554. I am always happy to talk it through.

The Quiet Landlord Exodus: Why South London Renters Should Be the Ones Worrying

Drive around Clapham, Balham or Brixton at the moment and you start to notice something. Flats that were quietly let for years are appearing on the sales portals. A landlord I have known for a decade told me last week he is cashing in two of his three flats near the Common. He is not angry about it. He has just done the maths - and the maths has changed.

Here is what is actually happening, away from the headlines. Property118 reported this week that Capital Gains Tax changes are now the single biggest reason landlords are selling. At the same time, the landlords who are staying in are restructuring hard: company incorporations are up an extraordinary 1,700% as buy-to-let owners move their portfolios into limited companies to shelter what they can from the tax. Overall landlord sentiment, on every survey I read, is weak and getting weaker.

That might sound like a landlord's problem. It isn't. It is a renter's problem, and in South London it is becoming an acute one.

Follow the chain. Every flat a landlord sells to an owner-occupier is a flat that leaves the rental pool for good. Propertymark now counts roughly eight renters chasing every available property. Nationwide has rents up 3.3% over the year, even as house-price growth has cooled to 1.8% - a telling split, because it shows demand pouring into renting exactly as supply drains out of it. Fewer rental homes plus more tenants competing for them equals one thing: higher rents and less choice for the very people the tax changes were never meant to hurt.

This is the uncomfortable truth I keep coming back to. We have spent several years making it less attractive to be a private landlord - higher taxes, more regulation, less flexibility - in the name of helping renters. But you cannot help renters by shrinking the number of homes available to rent. If the goal was genuinely to improve life for tenants in Clapham and across SW London, the answer was always going to be more homes, not fewer landlords.

So what do I tell people? Landlords: don't make an emotional decision. If you own a good flat in a strong South London location, the case for holding - or incorporating and holding - is often stronger than the case for selling into a flat market. The demand for your property has arguably never been higher. Renters: understand that the squeeze is structural, not a blip. When a well-priced flat comes up in the area you want, be ready to move fast, have your references and paperwork in order, and treat a good landlord as someone worth keeping.

Are you a South London landlord weighing up whether to sell or restructure, or a renter feeling the squeeze first-hand? I would really like to hear from you - drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call me on 07837 093554.

Fewer Sales, Longer Waits: Why Is Conveyancing Slower Than Ever?

There is a strange contradiction running through the property market right now, and if you are trying to buy or sell in South London you have probably felt it without being able to put your finger on it.

Fewer homes are actually changing hands. And yet every sale that does happen seems to crawl along more slowly than ever before.

That should not make sense. When there is less work in the system, things ought to move faster, not slower. So what is going on?

The numbers behind the frustration

Transaction volumes have cooled noticeably. HMRC's figures showed completed residential sales down again through the spring, and Zoopla's research points to stamp duty quietly dragging on activity across the south of England in particular. There are simply fewer deals in the pipeline than there were a year or two ago.

But here is the part that catches everyone out. The average time to get from an agreed sale to exchange of contracts has now stretched to around 125 days. Split that out and it is roughly 111 days for a freehold and 133 days for a leasehold. Back in 2019, before the pandemic reshaped everything, the same journey took closer to 76 days.

So the workload across the industry is lighter, but the process has never been slower. Four months, on average, from "yes" to legally committed — and often longer if there is a leasehold or a chain involved.

Where the time actually goes

I spend my working life on the phone chasing these transactions along, so let me tell you what I am seeing on the ground.

With fewer files to work through, a worrying number of solicitors seem to have gone looking for reasons to slow things down rather than reasons to move them forward. Enquiries that used to be handled in a quick line of correspondence now come back as a two-page list. Perfectly clean titles get picked apart. A missing FENSA certificate on a window replaced fifteen years ago becomes a three-week standoff. One industry commentator recently called it "death by due diligence," and honestly that is exactly what it feels like.

I want to be fair here. Nobody wants to be the professional who missed something, and a good conveyancer is protecting their client from real risk. That is their job and it matters. But there is a meaningful difference between protecting a client and manufacturing friction — and too much of what is slowing transactions down right now falls into the second category.

Why delay is so dangerous

Every extra week a transaction sits open is another week for something to go wrong. A buyer gets cold feet. A mortgage offer edges towards expiry. Someone further up or down the chain pulls out and takes everyone with them.

The data backs this up. Nearly one in four sales that fall through now collapse after the three-month mark, up sharply from a few years ago. And a large share of those late collapses have nothing to do with price or survey problems. They are about fatigue — people simply running out of patience and goodwill because the process dragged on far longer than anyone promised at the start.

That is the real cost of delay. It is not just an inconvenience. It is deals that were ready to complete quietly falling apart.

What this means if you are moving

The encouraging news is that this is not a demand problem. Buyers are still out there and good homes are still selling. What we have is a completion problem — and a lot of it is self-inflicted by the way the process is run.

If you are buying or selling, the single most useful thing you can do is choose your conveyancer on how they communicate, not just on the quote at the bottom of the page. A proactive solicitor who picks up the phone, replies to emails the same week and pushes a transaction forward is worth every penny over a cheaper firm that hides behind its inbox for a fortnight at a time. Ask how they will keep you updated. Ask how quickly they turn enquiries around. It is one of the few parts of this whole process you can genuinely influence.

Instruct early, get your paperwork ready before you even have a buyer or a purchase agreed, and stay on top of the timeline rather than assuming no news is good news.

The bottom line

The market has slowed, but the process has slowed faster — and that gap is where good deals are being lost. Picking the right people around you, and keeping the pressure on gently but consistently, is the difference between a move that completes and one that quietly falls apart.

If you are thinking about buying or selling in South London and want a straight, no-nonsense view on how to keep your move on track, I am always happy to have that conversation.

The End of Section 21: What No-Fault Eviction Reform Really Means for South London Landlords and Tenants

Walk past the lettings boards on Abbeville Road this week and nothing looks any different. But something big has just shifted under all of them. As of the 31st of July, Section 21 - the "no-fault" eviction that has underpinned the private rented sector for the best part of forty years - is history. Every assured tenancy in England is now periodic, rolling month to month, and no landlord can any longer ask a tenant to leave simply because the fixed term has run out.

If you rent in Clapham, Balham or Brixton, that is genuinely good news: your home is no longer on a two-month countdown. If you are one of the many local landlords I speak to, it is the biggest change to how you operate since the tenant fee ban. So let me cut through the noise.

The headline is simple. Fixed terms and no-fault notices are gone. To regain possession now, a landlord has to use one of the specific grounds under the new Schedule 2 - selling the property, moving back in, serious rent arrears, or a breach of the tenancy - and evidence it. Tessa Shepperson's Landlord Law bulletin has been walking through these grounds in detail, and the short version is this: possession is still possible, but it is now a reasoned process, not a rubber stamp.

Here is the bit the national headlines miss. The worry isn't the rule itself - most good landlords in SW London were never chasing people out for no reason. The worry is what it does to supply. Propertymark reported this week that there are now roughly eight renters chasing every available property. Eight. At the same time, Property118 is reporting landlords selling up in numbers, driven by Capital Gains Tax changes, with company incorporations up an eye-watering 1,700% as the ones who stay restructure. Nationwide has rents rising 3.3% over the year even as house-price growth cools to 1.8%.

Join those dots and you get the real South London story. If more landlords take the end of Section 21 as their cue to sell into a flat sales market, the pool of rental flats around the Common shrinks further - and with eight tenants per property already, it is the renter, not the landlord, who feels that most sharply. Fewer homes, more competition, higher rents. That is the opposite of what the reform set out to achieve.

My honest take? This is a good reform wrapped around a supply problem nobody has fixed. Landlords: don't panic-sell. A well-run, well-priced Clapham flat with a good long-term tenant is still one of the most resilient assets you can hold, and the new rules reward exactly that kind of landlord. Renters: the security is real, but the market is tighter than ever, so when the right place comes up, be ready to move quickly and present yourself well.

Are you a South London landlord weighing up whether to stay in or sell, or a tenant trying to make sense of your rights under the new rules? I'd genuinely love to hear where you've landed on it - drop me a line at jeroen@claphampropertyblog.com or call me on 07837 093554.